Government agents may monitor online chat rooms on the Internet to listen for evidence of illegal trading of child pornography.When challenged,a federal court held that this practice:
A) was an unconstitutional violation of the 4ᵗʰ Amendment as a form of warrantless search
B) was an unconstitutional violation of the 4ᵗʰ Amendment right to privacy
C) was an unconstitutional violation of the 1ˢᵗ Amendment right to freedom of speech
D) was constitutional because there was no right to privacy in that location
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q225: In Kelo v.City of New London,Conn. ,where
Q343: Based on the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary
Q344: Improperly gather evidence:
A) is not allowed in
Q349: In New York v. Burger, a junkyard
Q351: "No person shall be...compelled in any criminal
Q353: Warrentless searches:
A) are not allowed under any
Q356: The Fifth Amendment protects individuals against:
A) illegal
Q362: In Braswell v. U.S., the president and
Q369: Fifth Amendment protection does not apply to:
A)
Q374: The state of California told the owners
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents