In McCune v.Myrtle Beach Indoor Shooting Range,where McCune lost an eye playing paintball and sued the paintball facility,the appeals court held that the facility was not liable for McCune's injury because:
A)McCume expressly assumed the risk for all known and unknown risks while participating
B)McCume was over 18 when she signed the release of liability form
C)McCume was a rational adult who should have understood the inherent risks of paintball
D)McCume signed the release of liability form in front of witnesses
E)none of the other choices

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appeals court held that the paintball facility was not liable because McCune had expressly assumed the risk for all known and unknown risks while participating. This means that she acknowledged the potential danger of the activity and agreed to participate despite the risks.

In McCune V