In Fuerschbach v. Southwest Airlines, where Fuerschbach was "arrested" by the police as a prank at work, the appeals court held that there:
A) could be a tort of assault and battery by the police
B) could be a tort of assault and battery by the workers who arranged the "arrest"
C) could be no tort because no malice was involved
D) could be no tort because a reasonable person would not act like Fuerschbach did
E) none of the other choices

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Fuerschbach v. Southwest Airlines, where Fuerschbach was "arrested" by the police as a prank at work, the appeals court held that there:
A) could be a tort of assault and battery by the police
B) could be a tort of assault and battery by the workers who arranged the "arrest"
C) could be no tort because no malice was involved
D) could be no tort because a reasonable person would not act like Fuerschbach did
E) none of the other choices

In Fuerschbach V