In Reynolds v.Ethicon Endo-Surgery,where Reynolds suffered a miscarriage after she was told she would be fired if she did not move to another city for her employer,the appeals court held she had no case for emotional distress as there was no outrageous conduct involved.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appeals court found that the employer's actions did not meet the legal standard for "outrageous conduct" necessary to support a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

In Reynolds V