In Powell v.Washburn,where Powell sued the developer of a planned community he lived in for changing the covenants,conditions,and restrictions (CC&Rs)to allow recreational vehicles as residences in the development,the Arizona high court held that:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Arizona high court held that the CC&Rs would be read to give effect to the intent of the parties, which was not to allow other kinds of residences in the development. This means that the developer could not change the CC&Rs to allow recreational vehicles as residences without the consent of the landowners. Option A is incorrect because the court did not find that the developer had an unconditional right to change the CC&Rs at any time. Option B is incorrect because the court did not require the developer to get permission from a majority of landowners. Option D is incorrect because the court did not reference any legislative intent regarding flexibility in housing. Therefore, the best answer is C.

In Powell V