In Atkinson v.City of Pierre,Atkinson sued the city for not taking action to force an ice-making plant next to her apartment building to make less noise.There were no other complaints from residents near the plant,which contributed to the high court's decision that:
A) the business was not a nuisance
B) the business was a nuisance
C) the business was not a public nuisance,but was a private nuisance
D) Atkinson was being unlawfully bothered by the business
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q243: Your next door neighbor plays his stereo
Q247: When someone has interfered with the right
Q250: Thoni Manufacturing disposes of its waste water
Q251: A public nuisance involves an unreasonable interference
Q258: The major difference between public nuisance and
Q259: A _ an unreasonable interference with a
Q260: The tort defined as the intentional and
Q267: You go to a flea market and
Q275: Which of the following is an intentional
Q277: In Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents