In Crest Ridge Construction v. Newcourt, where an order for construction materials that Crest Ridge needed was rejected for failure to meet credit terms, and Crest Ridge had to find a higher-cost replacement and sued Newcourt for damages, the appeals court held that:
A) Crest Ridge had no basis for suit since the credit terms of the contract were clear and it failed to follow the instructions
B) Crest Ridge had no basis for suit since the credit terms of the contract were clear and it did not have sufficient credit history to qualify
C) Newcourt was liable as it imposed higher credit conditions on Crest Ridge than it stated were necessary in the contract
D) Newcourt was liable because, at the last minute. it changed the price it was going to charge, which required Crest Ridge to obtain more credit than it could qualify for
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q192: If the parties to a sale under
Q193: A person may hold legal title to
Q194: Under the common law, a contract cannot
Q195: In a sale under the UCC, title
Q196: If the parties to a sale under
Q198: Suppose parties to a contract that is
Q199: If the parties to a sale under
Q200: If a good has been stolen and
Q201: Under the common law, an offer can
Q202: A buyer and a seller would like
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents