In Axelson V

In Axelson v.McEvoy-Willis,McEvoy hired Axelson to build special equipment for oil rigs,after forms went back and forth,Axelson built equipment for McEvoy,which suddenly cancelled the contract.Axelson sued for damages;McEvoy noted the contract stated it could cancel at any time.The appeals court held that McEvoy:

A) was not in breach;the final contract agreed to by the parties clearly stated it could be cancelled at any time
B) was not in breach;the contract was for as many as McEvoy "needed" so once it had enough,it could cancel
C) was not in breach;Axelson tried to refer to terms of earlier contracts that were part of the negotiations,not the final terms
D) was in breach;the final contract was issued after work began,so its terms are not all relevant
E) none of the other choices