In Treibacher Industrie AG v.Allegheny Technology,Treibacher sued Allegheny,under the CISG,for breach of a contract that caused Treibacher to lose money on the sale of a hard metal powder when Allegheny cancelled the contract in favor of a less expensive supplier.The courts held that:
A) based on the two companies' past dealings with each other and Treibacher's reasonable attempts to mitigate losses,the district court's finding for Treibacher was correct
B) based on the two companies' past dealings with each other and Treibacher's unreasonable attempts to mitigate losses,the district court's finding for Treibacher was incorrect
C) Treibacher had no case because it was not an American company
D) Treibacher could not sue an American company
E) the district court improperly applied the CISG;it should have used the UCC
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: If the sale of a good also
Q7: Modern commercial law traces its roots to
Q9: Before the UCC contracts for the sale
Q15: In a dispute with a stock broker
Q26: Article 2A is a recent addition to
Q35: Jones is "a merchant" under Article 2
Q294: In Treibacher Industrie AG v.Allegheny Technology,Treibacher sued
Q295: In Treibacher Industrie AG v.Allegheny Technology,Treibacher sued
Q417: Commercial sales contracts that use the CISG:
A)
Q420: Comparing the UCC to the CISG, when
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents