In Axelson v.McEvoy-Willis,where Axelson cancelled an order for specialized oil rig equipment,in accord with the contract it sent when the deal was reached,the court held that it was the intent of the parties not to follow the written contract so the cancellation was a breach.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: With respect to parol evidence, the common
Q49: Under Article 2's statute of frauds, the
Q58: Under the UCC, parol evidence may be
Q60: The UCC's statute of frauds provision says
Q61: In Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout, where
Q65: Under the UCC, the court will determine
Q72: The UCC operates the same as the
Q78: In Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout, where
Q357: In Axelson v.McEvoy-Willis,where Axelson cancelled an order
Q359: When contracts conflict,it is called the "battle
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents