In Kramer v. ATW Axtell Tech, where Kramer bought Internet service equipment from ATW that did not work as well as advertised, the courts held that the award of "cover" expenses was not justified since all equipment "was off the shelf."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In the case of Kramer v. ATW Axtell Tech, there is no specific record or widely known legal precedent by that name related to the purchase of Internet service equipment and the award of "cover" expenses based on the equipment being "off the shelf." Legal principles regarding warranties, misrepresentation, and remedies such as "cover" expenses (which refer to the cost of obtaining substitute goods) depend on the specifics of the case, including the terms of the contract, the nature of the misrepresentation or failure, and applicable laws. Without a specific and recognized case, the statement cannot be validated as true.

In Kramer V