In Armstrong v.Food Lion,the Armstrongs were beaten by employees of a grocery store.They sued the store.The South Carolina high court held that the store was not liable because:
A) the employees were not servants of Food Lion when they attacked the Armstrongs
B) the employees were acting within the scope of their employment or in furtherance of Food Lion's business when the attacked they Armstrongs
C) the employees had only worked for Food Lion for 6 months when they attacked the Armstrongs
D) the employees had worked for Food Lion for more than 6 months when they attacked the Armstrongs
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A person appointed by an agent to
Q4: A principal's major reason for developing agency
Q15: Agency relationships used to be common in
Q19: An agent may not legally bind a
Q31: The legal document intended for the purpose
Q396: If a person could be expected to
Q403: Fact Pattern 14-1
Emile owns Emile's Used Car
Q404: Fact Pattern 14-1
Emile owns Emile's Used Car
Q407: Carter, who had been convicted of violent
Q416: Fact Pattern 14-1
Emile owns Emile's Used Car
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents