In Armstrong v.Food Lion,where employees at a grocery store beat two customers,the court held the store not liable for the attack because it was outside the scope of employment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q102: A principal held responsible for the torts
Q103: If an agent commits a tort outside
Q108: An employer should be cautious about hiring
Q110: The rule of law imposing vicarious liability
Q112: An employer could be liable for sexual
Q116: Employers may wish to state that employee
Q117: An employer could be liable for acts
Q118: Principals are liable for all torts committed
Q411: In Armstrong v.Food Lion,where employees at a
Q412: In Armstrong v.Food Lion,where employees at a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents