Solved

In Callison V

Question 161

Multiple Choice

In Callison v.City of Philadelphia,where Callison was told that while on FMLA leave that he had to be at home during work hour unless he called to report where he would be going,he sued to protest the policy.The court of appeals held that:


A) even though there is nothing in the FMLA that prevents employers from ensuring that employees on leave do not abuse their leave,the City's call-in policy did violated Callison's FMLA rights
B) the City's call-in policy was legal,but suspending Callison for violating it was not
C) the FMLA does not allow employers to check on employees who are on sick leave so the City's call-in policy was illegal
D) the City's call-in policy was a requirement of the FMLA and Callison should be fined for violating it
E) none of the other choices are correct

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents