In Callison v.City of Philadelphia,where Callison was told that while on FMLA leave that he had to be at home during work hour unless he called to report where he would be going,he sued to protest the policy.The court of appeals held that:
A) even though there is nothing in the FMLA that prevents employers from ensuring that employees on leave do not abuse their leave,the City's call-in policy did violated Callison's FMLA rights
B) the City's call-in policy was legal,but suspending Callison for violating it was not
C) the FMLA does not allow employers to check on employees who are on sick leave so the City's call-in policy was illegal
D) the City's call-in policy was a requirement of the FMLA and Callison should be fined for violating it
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q159: In Juarez v.CC Services,where Juarez was injured
Q160: In Juarez v.CC Services,where Juarez was injured
Q322: Which of the following workers would not
Q323: Under the _ employers with 50 or
Q325: For the Family and Medical Leave Act
Q326: The Family and Medical Leave Act gives
Q327: Employees among the 10 percent highest paid,
Q331: Which of the following qualifies as a
Q336: For the Family and Medical Leave Act
Q349: Under federal immigration law all:
A) employees must
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents