In Weyerhaeuser v.Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber,where Weyerhaeuser was accused of predatory bidding for raw timber to drive out a competitor,the Supreme Court held Weyerhaeuser was:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court held that Weyerhaeuser was not guilty as there was no evidence that it used its bidding power to raise output prices. Predatory bidding alone does not violate the Robinson-Patman Act, and the increase in market share alone does not necessarily indicate monopolistic impact. Additionally, there was no evidence that Weyerhaeuser raised prices of output after driving out the competition.

In Weyerhaeuser V