In Weyerhaeuser v.Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber the Supreme Court held that
Weyerhaeuser was outbidding its competitors to buy raw timber in an effort to get a larger market share and so violated the Robinson-Patman Act.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Weyerhaeuser v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber, the Supreme Court held that Weyerhaeuser's actions did not violate the Robinson-Patman Act because they were not engaged in price discrimination. Instead, the court found that Weyerhaeuser was engaged in legitimate competition by outbidding its competitors for the raw timber.

In Weyerhaeuser V