Ulrich files a suit against Vern to enforce a written con?tract. If the court finds that the parties intended the contract to be the final statement of their agreement, parol evidence can be admitted to prove
A) an orally agreed-on condition precedent.
B) terms discussed before the contract but not contained in it.
C) terms discussed at the time of the contract that contradict the written terms.
D) nothing.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Parol evidence can be admitted to prove an orally agreed-on condition precedent, which is an event that must occur before a party is obligated to perform under a contract. This does not contradict the written terms but rather clarifies when the contract obligations are to be triggered.

Ulrich Files a Suit Against Vern to Enforce a Written