Jamie works as a barista at Coffee-Hutz,a coffeehouse in New Jersey,with 60 other employees.He has been working there full time for 18 months.One day his wife called with some bad news.His mother-in-law and 10-year-old daughter,Delores,were severely injured in a car accident while returning from school.Jamie has asked his employer for leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) .In this scenario,which of the following statements is true?
A) Granting the leave is entirely at the discretion of the employer; the employer does not permit him the leave as it would hamper the functioning of Coffee-Hutz.
B) Jamie is not entitled to the leave because the number of hours he has worked during the preceding 12 months is less than what is required by the act.
C) Jamie is entitled to leave for taking care of his mother-in-law and daughter, regardless of his daughter's age.
D) Jamie is only entitled to the leave to take care of his daughter.
E) Jamie is not entitled to the leave because the provisions of the FMLA Act apply only to females.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: The Fourth Amendment protects public employees from
Q38: Which of the following provides requirements for
Q39: The exclusive remedy rule does not protect
Q40: Employment-at-will relationships are essentially employer-employee agreements that
Q41: If an employer already provides compensated breaks,an
Q43: Which of the following statements holds true
Q44: Which of the following acts provides a
Q45: Tom has a back injury that required
Q46: If an employee's tips combined with the
Q47: The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN)notice
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents