Lucinda is the sole shareholder and president of NailCo,a corporation that owns a chain of manicure and pedicure salons in the lower mainland of British Columbia.She visits most of NailCo's outlets weekly.She comes to you,her lawyer,to confess that over the past few months she has witnessed several of NailCo's employees dump nail polish down the drain on a number of occasions.Lucinda is now concerned that she and NailCo may be liable for the environmental consequences of these actions even though she personally did nothing.You would most likely advise Lucinda that
A) Lucinda should sue her employees.
B) she will have to comply with provincial legislation in future.
C) the corporation may be held liable for the environmental damage caused by its agents and employees in the course of their duties and that the corporation only has a due diligence defence if someone,like Lucinda,who is a directing mind and will of the corporation took reasonable steps to avoid the offence.
D) the company is not vicariously liable for the environmental damage caused by its agents and employees.
E) she should do nothing.Lucinda is not answerable for the independent actions of her staff.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q54: Government's role in the regulation of business
Q55: Nefarious Inc and Jaffar together control 90
Q56: A comfort or no-action letter
A)is a document,written
Q57: The Competition Bureau has long suspected HAL
Q58: Both the federal and provincial governments have
Q60: Tesco Inc is a large British supermarket
Q63: Who regulates the environment in Canada?
Q64: Seva Inc is a pharmaceutical manufacturer in
Q69: Flower Inc produces a brand of energy
Q75: Why are mergers reviewed by the Competition
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents