The 1833 case of Barron v.Baltimore revolved around the deprivation of

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The 1833 case Barron v. Baltimore concerned the Fifth Amendment's takings clause, which states that private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation. The case revolved around the city of Baltimore's construction of a wharf that blocked the flow of water to John Barron's nearby wharf, causing damage to his property. Barron sued Baltimore, claiming that the city had violated his Fifth Amendment rights by taking his property without just compensation. The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the Bill of Rights and the takings clause applied only to the federal government, not to state or local governments such as Baltimore. This decision established the principle of dual citizenship, which holds that individuals are subject to the laws of both their state and the federal government but have separate rights and protections under each.

The 1833 Case of Barron V