Which of the Following Is the Best Interpretation of the 1991

Which of the following is the best interpretation of the 1991 California v.Acevedo case?

A) Items that fall in the plain view of a lawfully present police officer may be seized and used as evidence in court.
B) An officer may search a vehicle without a search warrant provided that she has probable cause to think the vehicle contains contraband and that the vehicle is mobile.
C) Officers may not move any item to get a better view of evidence otherwise hidden from view.
D) An officer who has probable cause to believe that a container in a vehicle holds contraband may open the container and seize the contraband.