Which of these would be considered a reason in opposition to Texas having more publicly funded campaigns?
A) State support of candidates would free them of dependence on special interests.
B) Citizens would be forced to subsidize candidates whose views many citizens would strongly disagree with.
C) States would have the autonomy to devise a means of ensuring that participation in the system remained voluntary.
D) Allowing some fringe groups an opportunity to express their extremist views is good for democracy.
E) All of these are reasons in opposition to more publicly funded campaigns.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: The primary reason most people vote is
Q7: What two resources mustall political candidateshave regardless
Q8: When minorities in Texas fail to vote,_
Q9: Which of these is not afactor that
Q10: The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972
Q12: Voter turnout in Texas is _.
A)above the
Q13: The _ is the period of time
Q14: The Twenty-fourth Amendment to the U.S.Constitution outlawed
Q15: Whichof thesewould be considered a reason in
Q16: The equal protection clause,which guaranteeseach citizen the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents