Which of the following need NOT be proved in order to establish the defense of economic duress?
A) That one side involuntarily accepted the terms of another.
B) That circumstances permitted no other alternative.
C) That one party explicitly made the economic threat.
D) That the circumstances leading up to the contract were the result of coercive acts of the opposite party.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

To establish the defense of economic duress, it is not necessary to prove that one party explicitly made an economic threat. The focus is on whether the terms were involuntarily accepted due to no reasonable alternative, often due to coercive circumstances, rather than on explicit threats.

Which of the Following Need NOT Be Proved in Order