Would a letter written after the execution of a contract and which contained agreements different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule?
A) No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract.
B) No, because it changes the agreement.
C) No, because it explains the agreement.
D) Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The parol evidence rule generally prohibits the admission of evidence outside the contents of a written contract that would add to, contradict, or alter the terms of the written contract. However, if a letter or document is created after the execution of the contract and it modifies the agreement, it can be admissible because it represents a subsequent agreement between the parties.

Would a Letter Written After the Execution of a Contract