A written, integrated contract contains a provision that states it will be effective for a "year." The plaintiff in a lawsuit claims that a "year" is obviously 12 months.The defendant claims that the contract meant a 10-month school year.Parol evidence:
A) cannot be used to explain the term, because the plain meaning of a "year" is 12 months.
B) cannot be used to explain the term, because the contract is an integrated document.
C) can be used by the parties to clarify their intent because the term "year" in the contract is ambiguous.
D) cannot be used, because the contract contains an express term that could have been changed by the parties prior to the contract's execution.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q61: With regard to the interpretation of a
Q65: Which of the following promises in consideration
Q68: Sam orally agreed to sell his house
Q69: In the Jenkins v.Eckerd Corporation case, the
Q70: General contract law states that contracts that
Q76: Would a letter written after the execution
Q77: On March 1, Tammy, a student, received
Q78: Which of the following is untrue with
Q80: Barry's Sport Shop calls Champion Tee Shirt
Q81: Under the Restatement and the Code, when
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents