The United States Supreme Court generally has held that an agreement creating the power to monopolize interstate commerce should not automatically be condemned as an unlawful restraint of interstate commerce.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The United States Supreme Court has held that an agreement creating the power to monopolize interstate commerce should not automatically be condemned as an unlawful restraint of interstate commerce. This is based on the rule of reason, which requires a case-by-case analysis of whether the agreement unreasonably restrains trade.

The United States Supreme Court Generally Has Held That an Agreement