Under the Supreme Court's Decision in Brandenburg V.Ohio

Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brandenburg v.Ohio,

A) any speech making direct or abstract advocacy of forcible action is not protected under the First Amendment.
B) the Court interpreted sedition statutes as prohibiting only advocacy, not discussion under the First Amendment.
C) advocating overthrow of the government was defined as a crime under the Fourth Amendment.
D) the Alien and Sedition Acts were upheld as constitutional under the First Amendment.
E) speech showing imminent danger and the likelihood that the danger will actually occur is not protected under the First Amendment.