The question of how best to protect people against unjust searches without unduly hindering criminal investigations is settled in most democratic countries by
A) excluding improperly gathered evidence from trial regardless of how relevant it is.
B) assuming that protecting people from unjust searches is more important than any hindrance that criminal investigations may have to endure.
C) defining "unjust" in such a strict manner that no police search could ever reasonably be considered unjust.
D) allowing all relevant evidence at trial regardless of how it was obtained, then doling out punishment after the trial if the evidence was obtained improperly.
E) None of these are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: The practice of law-enforcement officers taking money
Q51: The landmark case on involuntary confession was
Q52: The main provisions of the USA Patriot
Q53: Since 1992,having a member of the clergy
Q54: The historical reference to a "wall of
Q56: Search warrants are not to be issued
Q57: The question of how best to protect
Q58: Regarding the exclusionary rule,more recent decisions of
Q59: The Supreme Court demanded that the evidence
Q60: The exclusionary rule holds that
A) double jeopardy cannot
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents