Gregory went to Collegiate Sports Ltd.with his dad,who asked for some shoes for Gregory suitable for playing squash.Gregory was given a pair of running shoes suitable only for jogging.His dad paid by cash.That evening,wearing the new shoes while playing squash,Gregory broke his ankle.In the ensuing lawsuit,the statement of claim cited the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act.Which of the following is true if it were proven that the shoes were inappropriate and the cause of the injury?
A) This is not a sale of goods situation because Gregory's father paid by cash.
B) This is a "buyer beware" situation and there would be no remedy for anyone.
C) Only Gregory can sue since he was the only one hurt.
D) Gregory's father would be the proper plaintiff in this action and could win on the claim that the goods were not fit for purpose.
E) Gregory's father could win for breach of contract because he made known the purpose for which he wanted the shoes to a shoe dealer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q44: Which of the following is true with
Q45: Quiet possession means that goods have to
Q46: Mrs.Quale bought a new sewing machine from
Q49: O'Neil bought a new car from a
Q50: Edward goes to his neighbourhood hardware store
Q51: If goods are purchased by description or
Q68: Under the Sale of Goods Act, the
Q77: When the sale of goods is involved
Q101: Explain what is meant by merchantable quality.
Q105: Where the parties fail to state a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents