Suppose that a government agency is trying to decide between two pollution reduction policy options. Under the permit option, 100 pollution permits would be sold, each allowing emission of one unit of pollution. Firms would be forced to shut down if they produced any units of pollution for which they did not hold a permit. Under the pollution tax option, firms would be taxed $250 for each unit of pollution emitted. The regulated firms all currently pollute and face varying costs of pollution reduction, though all face increasing marginal costs of pollution reduction. Suppose the regulators chose the permit policy instead of the tax policy. What might explain that decision?
A) Permit auctions raise more revenue than do taxes.
B) The permit policy allows regulators to achieve reduction goals without having detailed knowledge about firms' abatement costs.
C) The permit policy will reduce pollution by more than would the tax policy.
D) Firms prefer the permit policy because it allows them to choose the least-costly reduction technology.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q174: Two firms, Acme and FirmCo, have access
Q175: Two firms, Industrio and Capitalista, have access
Q176: Two firms, Industrio and Capitalista, have access
Q177: Compared to a fixed percentage reduction regulation,
Q178: Two firms, Industrio and Capitalista, have access
Q179: Compared to taxing pollution, an advantage of
Q180: Two firms, Industrio and Capitalista, have access
Q181: Pollution permit policies achieve an _ outcome
Q182: Suppose that a government agency is trying
Q184: Suppose you are an economic researcher, and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents