Moscovitch and Moscovitch (2000) compared prosopagnosic patients and object-agnosic patients.What did they find?
A) There were no differences between the two patient types.
B) Patients with object agnosia were normal at face recognition but showed deficits in object recognition.Prosopagnosic patients showed deficits in facial recognition but not object recognition.
C) Object-agnosic patients show deficits in all stimuli, whereas the prosopagnosic agnostic patients showed deficits only in recognizing faces and had normal responses to all other stimuli.
D) The prosopagnosic agnostic patients recovered more quickly than did the object-agnosic patients.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: What are geons?
A)viruses that affect visual perception
B)objects
Q28: Viewing which of the following would activate
Q29: A patient suffering from prosopagnosia is most
Q30: Looser and Wheatley (2010) pointed out that
Q31: Quiroga et al.(2005) examined single-cell recordings of
Q33: Face agnosia, a neurological injury resulting in
Q34: Grill-Spector, Knouf, and Kanwisher (2004) examined the
Q35: An area of the brain in the
Q36: Looser and Wheatley (2010) compared the responses
Q37: The region in the temporal lobe that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents