In Samson v.Federal Express Corporation,Samson sued Federal Express under the ADA,claiming his job offer as a technician was withdrawn solely because he had failed his DOT medical examination because he had diabetes - a disqualifier for operating a motor vehicle in interstate commerce.What was the appellate court's ruling?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A) The trial court's ruling in favor of the employer was reversed because there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether test-driving was truly "essential" to the job of technician and remanded the case to a jury trial.
S) The trial court's ruling in favor of the employer was reversed because there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether test-driving was truly "essential" to the job of technician and remanded the case to a jury trial.
T) The trial court's ruling in favor of the employer was reversed because there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether test-driving was truly "essential" to the job of technician and remanded the case to a jury trial.
U) The trial court's ruling in favor of the employer was reversed because there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether test-driving was truly "essential" to the job of technician and remanded the case to a jury trial.

In Samson V