While franchisors defend restrictive contract provisions regarding purchases of goods and services as being essential for a common image,franchisees argue that such restrictions may constitute antitrust.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Franchisees argue that restrictions on purchases of goods and services may constitute antitrust, meaning they may be violating laws that prohibit anti-competitive behavior in the market.

While Franchisors Defend Restrictive Contract Provisions Regarding Purchases of Goods