In 1995, a popular chewing gum manufacturer decided to market a new line of gum in the state of New York, claiming use of its product would whiten one's teeth. However, scientific studies found the opposite to be true, and eventually the government forced the company to remove the claim from the product's packaging. Why was the chewing gum manufacturer's speech not protected under the First Amendment?
A) An advertising claim does not have full protection under the First Amendment because it is not political speech.
B) The Supreme Court ruled that the false advertising constituted an uncompensated "taking" under the Fifth Amendment.
C) Only individuals possess First Amendment rights; businesses do not.
D) It was a state issue, and the speech was not protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q91: The requirement that the judicial system must
Q92: Why are there so few convictions of
Q93: When evidence obtained from an illegal search
Q94: Why is commercial speech not entitled to
Q95: Among other things, the provision that no
Q97: Why has the Supreme Court allowed restrictions
Q98: Which convention states that persons under arrest
Q99: The case of Mapp v. Ohio established
Q100: According to modern interpretation of the principle
Q101: The basis for the Supreme Court's decision
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents