On February 1,Smyth contracted to buy Dupont's van.They had agreed that Smyth would pay the price of $7000 on March 1 and take delivery and the risk on that date.Smyth then contracted to sell the van in Smithers on March 5 for $7600.On February 22,Dupont called Smyth and said he wasn't going to sell it; he decided to keep it.Based on these facts,which of the following is false?
A) Dupont's call is an express repudiation of the contract and is an anticipatory breach.
B) Smyth could agree to call off the contract; neither of them had yet performed.
C) Smyth could refuse to acknowledge a breach, but that would result in the possibility that the contract could be breached later.
D) Smyth could acknowledge that Dupont was in breach but has to wait until after the performance date to sue him for breach of contract.
E) Smyth could refuse to acknowledge a breach and press Dupont to complete the contact.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following is true with
Q2: Which of the following statements is correct
Q3: Gill,a wholesale fish seller,agreed to provide Blanchet's
Q5: Which of the following statements is true
Q6: Pat O'Grady owes Robinson $5000 in cash,but
Q8: Which of the following would most likely
Q9: In which one of the following instances
Q10: When an anticipatory breach has taken place
Q49: Mike contracted to buy Rita's house in
Q63: Which of the following is true with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents