Paul and Robert designed a new disc holder that they wanted to introduce to a large market.They decided that the quickest way to have their product recognized would be a symbol that would alert the buyer that it can be used with any computer.After playing with some symbols,they decided to use a slight variation of Apple Computer Ltd.'s symbol of an apple because it was pleasing to the eye and well-known.Which of the following is true?
A) There could be no infringement of Apple Computer Ltd.'s registered trademark unless the apple symbol used by Paul and Robert were exactly like its symbol.
B) There could be no infringement of Apple Computer Ltd.'s registered trademark unless Apple Computer Ltd. suffered a loss because of this unauthorized use of its symbol.
C) It is one of the jobs of the trademark office to alert owners of trademarks when their symbols are being used by others.
D) If Apple Computer Ltd. did sue Paul and Robert for infringement of trademark, it could ask the court for an injunction as well as for damages.
E) Even if Paul and Robert knowingly forged the trademark, they would only be liable in a civil action and could never be charged with a criminal offence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: As part of his preparation for a
Q37: Which of the following is true with
Q67: Jurg was hosting a luncheon when his
Q68: In Durham Condominium Corporation No.123 v.Amberwood Investments
Q69: Which of the following is false with
Q70: The case of Horn Ventures International Inc.v.Horn
Q71: Which of the following is false with
Q73: In Spycher Estate v.J.L.Coulter Ltd.,a mobile home
Q76: Which of the following is true with
Q77: Mr.and Mrs.Dunn were divorced and Mr.Dunn applied
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents