Nate's testimony would be considered circumstantial evidence because:
A) if believed, it makes it more probable that Ricky stole the ring.
B) the judge gave the jury an instruction on limited admissibility.
C) the jury must draw an inference before they can conclude that Ricky stole the ring.
D) it only establishes the theft if the parties stipulate to his testimony.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: Explain the difference between cumulative evidence and
Q46: Should Judge John take judicial notice that
Q47: Define direct evidence and circumstantial evidence.Explain the
Q48: Define relevant evidence. When is relevant evidence
Q49: Explain the use of testimonial evidence.Give two
Q50: Whose testimony is most likely to be
Q51: Which item would be considered real evidence
A)Mike's
Q53: Should Judge John give a jury instruction
Q54: List three (3) types of substitutes for
Q55: What testimony would be considered cumulative
A)Larry's statement
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents