In Symons V

In Symons v.Heaton,the case in the text,the court held that:

A) Symons' unjust enrichment claim was successful because Plachek received a benefit from Symons.
B) Symons' unjust enrichment claim failed because,among other things,Symons never expected payment and took care of Plachek because he was his friend.
C) an implied in fact contract existed based on the parties' conduct.
D) an implied in fact contract existed because Plachek told Symons that he wanted him to have his estate when he died.