The case in the text,Pittman v.Henry Moncure Motors,demonstrates that:
A)11 years of continued use constitutes acceptance.
B)a buyer may revoke acceptance after accepting the goods because of the seller's assurances that it would cure the defect but eventually,never cures the defect.
C)a buyer's failure to notify a seller within a reasonable amount of time that the goods are nonconforming waives any claims it may have for breach of contract.
D)a buyer can revoke acceptance when the nonconforming goods minimally impairs the value of the goods.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This case demonstrates that a buyer can revoke acceptance,even after 11 years,when it accepted the home because of the seller's assurances that it would cure the defects-which it never did.

The Case in the Text,Pittman V