Rawls argued that behind a 'veil of ignorance':

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rawls argued that behind a 'veil of ignorance', where individuals do not know their class, race, gender, abilities, or other characteristics, they would agree to 'just' rules to reallocate income. This is because individuals would want to secure the best outcome for themselves without knowing their position in society, which could be disadvantaged in any other system. Therefore, everyone would agree to fair and just distribution of resources.

Rawls Argued That Behind a 'Veil of Ignorance