In Kasky v.Nike,Inc. ,the California Supreme Court drew a distinction between a noncommercial speaker's statements criticizing a product are generally noncommercial speech and a commercial speaker's statements in praise or support of the same product.What was this distinction,and why did the California Supreme Court make it?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Kasky v.Nike,Inc. ,the California Supreme Court drew a distinction between a noncommercial speaker's statements criticizing a product are generally noncommercial speech and a commercial speaker's statements in praise or support of the same product.What was this distinction,and why did the California Supreme Court make it?

In Kasky V