In PGA Tour Inc

In PGA Tour Inc., v. Martin, Martin was a golfer who sought accommodation, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, for a recognized disability that caused pain due to restricted blood flow between his legs and heart. He asked to use a cart, which would permit him to play full rounds of golf. The PGA responded that its rules prohibited carts during tournament play and that allowing cart use would fundamentally change the game. The court determined that:

A) Martin should be allowed to use the cart because it provides him with little or no advantage under the circumstances and such an accommodation is not unreasonable and does not fundamentally change the game.
B) Martin should be allowed to use the cart because carts are used at country clubs where strict rules of golf are required, so the PGA ban is arbitrary and discriminatory.
C) Martin should not be allowed to use the cart because having one player using a cart and banning all others discriminates against the other players.
D) Martin should not be allowed to use the cart because there are other accommodations offered by the PGA that are reasonable and Martin has no right to reject them.