In DiMercurio v.Sphere Drake Insurance,DiMercurio was a fisherman who worked on a boat in Massachusetts.The boat was insured by a British insurance company,Sphere Drake.The boat DiMercurio worked on sank and he was injured.The company he worked for could not pay the damages DiMercurio won against them in court but gave their rights against its insurer,Sphere Drake,to DiMercurio.The insurance policy between the boat owners and Sphere Drake included an arbitration clause.Sphere Drake sought to enforce the arbitration while DiMercurio argued that it would be too burdensome on the parties that he would have to travel to London for arbitration.The appellate court held that:
A) the international travel was overly burdensome and the arbitration clause was not valid.
B) DiMercurio did not agree to the arbitration clause with Sphere Drake, the boat owner did, therefore the arbitration clause is not valid.
C) the arbitration clause is valid because arbitration clauses once agreed on are always valid.
D) the arbitration clause is valid under a four-part analysis that included the consideration of the commercial relationship having a reasonable relation with a foreign country
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q65: What is the purpose of the Madrid
Q68: What are the sources of international law?
Q69: Describe the current state of international protections
Q71: In a contract governed by UNCISG,when must
Q72: Which treaty is the standard that courts
Q74: What is the role of the International
Q75: A website lets anyone sell items to
Q77: Platkos Inc.applies for a permit to import
Q78: What are the four major types of
Q80: Which of these is not a prominent
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents