Suppose two point sources are discharging phosphorus into Wisconsin's Fox River and face the following abatement costs for this pollutant:
Point Source 1: TAC1 = 500 + 0.35(A1)2
MAC1 = 0.7A1
Point Source 2: TAC2 = 750 + 1.05(A2)2
MAC2 = 2.1A2,
where A1 and A2 represent the abatement of phosphorus effluents in pounds by Source 1 and Source 2, respectively, and TAC and MAC are measured in hundreds of dollars.
Assume that the state environmental authority has set the total maximum daily load (TMDL) for the Fox River. To achieve this limit, 40 pounds of phosphorus must be abated across the two point sources. Use this information to answer the following questions.
a. If a uniform abatement standard is used by the regulatory authority, what would be the dollar values of TAC and MAC for each source?
b. Based on your answer to part (a), is there an economic incentive for the sources to participate in the trading program? Explain briefly.
c. Quantify the cost savings associated with a cost-effective abatement allocation achieved through trading.
d. What should be the price level of the tradable permits to achieve the cost-effective solution?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q41: In a tradeable effluent permit market,
A) effluent
Q42: When an effluent fee is put in
Q43: Suppose that the costs and benefits of
Q44: Among the identified point sources contributing to
Q45: When faced with a marginal effluent fee
Q47: Tradeable effluent markets
A) exist only in the
Q48: The watershed approach
A) is a framework used
Q49: Suppose that the costs and benefits of
Q50: Suppose that the costs and benefits of
Q51: According to U.S. water quality control policy,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents