What was the result in the case in the text Lucy v.Zehmer involving whether allegations of joking prevented the formation of the contract involved?
A) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was joking,and a reasonable person should have known that.
B) The court ruled that the contract would be enforced because of what the parties verbally said regardless of whether an objective person would have thought joking was involved.
C) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because the parties had been drinking although they were not intoxicated.
D) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was subjectively joking.
E) The court ruled that the agreement would be enforced because under the applicable standard,it was not apparent that joking was involved.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: What was the result in the Opening
Q4: If an offeree makes a mistake and
Q5: If the means by which an acceptance
Q5: What standard do courts use to interpret
Q7: An invitation to negotiate is an offer
Q9: Courts interpret contracts using an objective standard.
Q10: Only the offeree to whom an offer
Q13: If the offeror becomes incapacitated,the offer terminates
Q14: The number of circumstances under which silence
Q20: In the absence of a time condition
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents