Which of the following was the result in Paula E.Rossman v.Fleet Bank R.I. ) National Association,the case in the text in which the plaintiff sued the defendant after she opened a credit card account based on the promise that no annual fee would be charged;but the policy was changed shortly thereafter,and she was charged an annual fee?
A) That the defendant was liable to the plaintiff because it engaged in a bait-and-switch scheme.
B) That the defendant was liable to the plaintiff because it violated provisions of the Truth in Lending Act.
C) That the defendant committed no violation of the law because its offer disclosed that terms and policies could be changed.
D) That the defendant committed no violation because it was not required to disclose future fees,only current ones.
E) That the defendant committed no violation of the law because it was entitled to change its policies at will.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: State laws in regard to protection of
Q4: Regarding regulation of advertising in China,which of
Q5: Canada's cigarette labeling requirements are less strict
Q8: Which of the following schemes involves websites
Q10: Paul's Puppy toys advertises dog bones for
Q11: Which of the following was the result
Q13: After an FTC complaint, if the judge
Q16: A statute or administrative rule serving to
Q18: If a person believes that she is
Q19: Creditors may require, under the Equal Credit
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents