In the "Case Nugget," Ziva Jewelry Inc. ,v.Car Wash Headquarters Inc. ,the plaintiff left his car and keys with a car wash employee and a thief drove off with the car,abandoning it unharmed after stealing jewelry valued at over $800,000 from the car's trunk.What was the final holding of the court in this case?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the dismissal of the case on grounds that a bailee is not liable for the loss of the contents of a bailed vehicle when the bailee did not have actual or implied knowledge of the contents of the vehicle.
B)The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the dismissal of the case on grounds that a bailee is not liable for the loss of the contents of a bailed vehicle when the bailee did not have actual or implied knowledge of the contents of the vehicle.
C)The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the dismissal of the case on grounds that a bailee is not liable for the loss of the contents of a bailed vehicle when the bailee did not have actual or implied knowledge of the contents of the vehicle.
D)The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the dismissal of the case on grounds that a bailee is not liable for the loss of the contents of a bailed vehicle when the bailee did not have actual or implied knowledge of the contents of the vehicle.
E)The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the dismissal of the case on grounds that a bailee is not liable for the loss of the contents of a bailed vehicle when the bailee did not have actual or implied knowledge of the contents of the vehicle.