Which of the following was the result in Choices in Cmty.Living Inc. ,v.Petkus,the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that the defendant violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA)by discriminating against the cognitively disabled in the provision of housing?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)According to the court,the defendants rebutted the inference of discrimination
by offering a legitimate,nondiscriminatory reason for not showing the house to the disabled applicants in that the proposed tenancy was unlawful under the zoning code.
B)According to the court,the defendants rebutted the inference of discrimination by offering a legitimate,nondiscriminatory reason for not showing the house to the disabled applicants in that the proposed tenancy was unlawful under the zoning code.
C)According to the court,the defendants rebutted the inference of discrimination by offering a legitimate,nondiscriminatory reason for not showing the house to the disabled applicants in that the proposed tenancy was unlawful under the zoning code.
D)According to the court,the defendants rebutted the inference of discrimination by offering a legitimate,nondiscriminatory reason for not showing the house to the disabled applicants in that the proposed tenancy was unlawful under the zoning code.
E)According to the court,the defendants rebutted the inference of discrimination by offering a legitimate,nondiscriminatory reason for not showing the house to the disabled applicants in that the proposed tenancy was unlawful under the zoning code.

Which of the Following Was the Result in Choices in Cmty.Living