In the case text Premium of America LLC v.Sanchez,investors that were liquidating life insurance policies sued a physician for negligent misrepresentation and alleged the life expectancy estimates he provided for persons suffering from HIV/AIDS were underestimated.Which of the following was the result?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The physician was unaware of the existence of the investors at the time of preparation of the reports,and the investors were unaware of the physician at the time they purchased the viatical contracts as the reports were only provided
post-purchase.As a result,the investors failed to prove the existence of contractual privity between the parties.Furthermore,the investors failed to demonstrate that the physician intended for his information to be supplied to the investors.The undisputed facts showed that the physician did not know what use was to be made of the evaluations and did not know they would be provided to third parties.As a result,there was no duty of care extending from the physician to the investors.
B)The physician was unaware of the existence of the investors at the time of preparation of the reports,and the investors were unaware of the physician at the time they purchased the viatical contracts as the reports were only provided
post-purchase.As a result,the investors failed to prove the existence of contractual privity between the parties.Furthermore,the investors failed to demonstrate that the physician intended for his information to be supplied to the investors.The undisputed facts showed that the physician did not know what use was to be made of the evaluations and did not know they would be provided to third parties.As a result,there was no duty of care extending from the physician to the investors.
C)The physician was unaware of the existence of the investors at the time of preparation of the reports,and the investors were unaware of the physician at the time they purchased the viatical contracts as the reports were only provided
post-purchase.As a result,the investors failed to prove the existence of contractual privity between the parties.Furthermore,the investors failed to demonstrate that the physician intended for his information to be supplied to the investors.The undisputed facts showed that the physician did not know what use was to be made of the evaluations and did not know they would be provided to third parties.As a result,there was no duty of care extending from the physician to the investors.
D)The physician was unaware of the existence of the investors at the time of preparation of the reports,and the investors were unaware of the physician at the time they purchased the viatical contracts as the reports were only provided
post-purchase.As a result,the investors failed to prove the existence of contractual privity between the parties.Furthermore,the investors failed to demonstrate that the physician intended for his information to be supplied to the investors.The undisputed facts showed that the physician did not know what use was to be made of the evaluations and did not know they would be provided to third parties.As a result,there was no duty of care extending from the physician to the investors.

In the Case Text Premium of America LLC V