A U.S. company's foreign subsidiary had the following amounts in stickles (§), the functional currency, in 2011:

The average exchange rate during 2011 was §1 = $.96. The beginning inventory was acquired when the exchange rate was §1 = $1.20. The ending inventory was acquired when the exchange rate was §1 = $.90. The exchange rate at December 31, 2011 was §1 = $.84. At what amount should the foreign subsidiary's cost of goods sold have been reflected in the 2011 U.S. dollar income statement?

Question

A U.S. company's foreign subsidiary had the following amounts in stickles (§), the functional currency, in 2011:

The average exchange rate during 2011 was §1 = $.96. The beginning inventory was acquired when the exchange rate was §1 = $1.20. The ending inventory was acquired when the exchange rate was §1 = $.90. The exchange rate at December 31, 2011 was §1 = $.84. At what amount should the foreign subsidiary's cost of goods sold have been reflected in the 2011 U.S. dollar income statement?

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of A U.S. company's foreign subsidiary had the following amounts in stickles (§), the functional currency, in 2011:

The average exchange rate during 2011 was §1 = $.96. The beginning inventory was acquired when the exchange rate was §1 = $1.20. The ending inventory was acquired when the exchange rate was §1 = $.90. The exchange rate at December 31, 2011 was §1 = $.84. At what amount should the foreign subsidiary's cost of goods sold have been reflected in the 2011 U.S. dollar income statement?

A US Company's Foreign Subsidiary Had the Following Amounts in Stickles